Thursday, October 30, 2008
laundary is evil
Wednesday, October 29, 2008
cooooold
Tuesday, October 28, 2008
boredom
Monday, October 27, 2008
uh oh
Tuesday, October 21, 2008
booo being sick
Sunday, October 19, 2008
weekend recap
Friday, October 17, 2008
weekenddd finally
Thursday, October 16, 2008
schedules
Wednesday, October 15, 2008
Rhetorical Analysis #2
Although this article essentially disagrees with what I want to argue, (that sports are healthy for women), it is important to see both sides of the issue and this article particularly caught my eye. The article comes from a science journal so it uses cold, hard facts to prove it’s point. This article is written in a grand style, as indicated by Engagements with Rhetoric. It uses scientific terms, such as amenorrhea and osteoporosis to explain negative impacts that sports have on girls. These terms indicate a sophisticated style of language and that the article is written for a well-educated audience, particularly orthopaedic nurses. The article uses statistical analysis as solid facts to persuade readers.
This text focuses mainly on the logos appeal. It is filled with facts, both historical and statistical, that make people stop to think. For example, the article states that the number of female athletes increased from 294,000 to 2.6 million in 1997 after Title IX was implemented. It was also shocking to see the statistics that 32% of college females athletes are reported to have some sort of eating disorder. These facts and statistics draw the reader in and make them curious to know more information. There is a slight degree of pathos used in the conclusion of this article. The article focuses on how negative sports are on females and then it suddenly switches to speak about how it can be fixed with the help of orthopaedic professionals. It says that it is their job to screen and help female athletes with these diseases. It uses the emotional appeal that the audience can help girls cope with and avoid these problems.
This article uses the five stasis to persuade the audience. It defines such terms as amenorrhea and osteoporosis, as well as giving examples of eating disorders. The article states that sports are the cause of all of these problems in women. It evaluates that these causes are bad and have a negative impact on women’s bodies. The action they believe should be taken is that of orthopaedic doctors and nurses who should be well prepared to deal with this increasingly more popular problem. The jurisdiction in this piece is tricky because the article supports Title IX and that women deserve equal opportunities; however, it indirectly cautions that Title IX could be causing women to be more susceptible to eating disorders.
Monday, October 13, 2008
cursed
Friday, October 10, 2008
family weekend
Wednesday, October 8, 2008
brrrr its cold outside
Tuesday, October 7, 2008
rhetorical analysis 1 : volkswagon commercial
The always popular Volkswagon commercials entice and intrigue viewers of all ages. Though primarily targeted at the youth of America, approximately ages fourteen through thirty, I have personally seen all ages crack up to this commercial. Volkswagon uses the element of humor to draw in the audience’s attention. This commercial mainly pertains to the pathos of the reader. They are trying to appeal to the audience’s sense of humor by dressing in outlandish costumes and poking fun at teenager’s senses of “coolness.” This commercial is taking a jab at the popular show “Pimp My Ride” on MTV. On the show they “trick out” cars by painting them bright colors, and making them look out of the ordinary. This commercial also quotes a popular Snoop Dogg song “Drop It Like It’s Hot,” after dropping a brand new car on Jason’s old, outdated car. In addition, the German engineer in trying to be cool attempts at making some sort of Volkswagon hand gesture much like that of well known American gangs. A nickname of “Vdub” is used, poking fun at teenager’s use of slang terms and modern lingo. This commercial does a good job appealing to it’s target audience although it appears outlandish. There was no noticable logos or ethos. The main focus was on the pathos in this commercial.
This commercial also uses logical fallacies, the abuse of logic, to captivate the audience’s attention. Volkswagon greatly exaggerates what the youth think is cool and how they dress. They try to portray the image that if you drive a Volkswagon, you are automatically considered cool. Obviously this is not true because cool does not necessarily have a definition, nor is it defined by a type of car. Another logical fallacy in the commercial is that German’s are all really smart and technologically savvy. They have engineers in their stereotypical white lab coats with thick German accents. Once again, all Volkswagon employees are not remarkably intelligent German engineers with thick German accents.
Different ages and nationalities may view this commercial differently. German’s may take offense to the abuse of their accent in the commercial. The elderly may not understand the jokes that Volkswagon is trying to convey if they are not up to date with modern pop culture. Even middle aged adults might not get the joke of the commercial if they do not have teenage children or if they are simply out of the loop. Volkswagon took a risk in making this commercial at offending many of it’s potential customer’s; however, from experience, their target audience approves of the humor in their commercial. I believe this commercial was successful in relaying their message to their target audience.